Obama Regime Removed Bolts From Marines’ Rifles

Obama’s inexcusable nomination of Chuck Hagel to head the Department of Defense has made his characteristic liberal dislike of the military more obvious than ever. Apparently, the Moonbat Messiah assumes the Marines feel the same way about him:

Take a close look at the M-14 rifles the Marines where carrying at Obama’s second inauguration. The bolts have been removed from the rifles rendering them unable to fire a round.

Apparently Obama’s Secret Service doesn’t trust the USMC. Simply searching each guy to make sure he didn’t have a live round hidden on him wasn’t enough, they had to make sure the guns were inoperable.

Remember all those times George Bush (miss him yet?) traveled to Iraq to meet the troops? Troops who had working rifles slung on their shoulders, with loaded magazines in pouches on their belt.


Obama must figure the Marines know him a lot better than they did four years ago, when bolts were allowed:

Wondering if this may be an inauguration policy of long standing that transcends administrations, Gun Rights Examiner made a cursory search and found something even more curious. In the 2009 Inaugural Parade, the United States Navy marched with rifles that had not been so disabled (see 1:24 into that video plus the final slide).

Bad enough Obama doesn’t trust American citizens with firearms. If he doesn’t even trust the Marines, then it’s no wonder his DHS has been buying up ammo by the billions of rounds. Obama did promise an ominous “national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the entire US military. He will certainly need it if his fundamental transformation calls for fighting the Marines.

marinesgunless_zpsa181d95b.jpg


mb.com
 
They don't need loaded guns. I mean, they won't have to defend themselves or their families or homes from crimes.
So why would their guns be loaded ?
Removing the bolts reduces the risks of accidental shots.
 

Mr. Daystar

In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
Maybe that's why the one on the left looks like he's about to release steam from his ears.

Johan said:
They don't need loaded guns. I mean, they won't have to defend themselves or their families or homes from crimes.
So why would their guns be loaded ?
Removing the bolts reduces the risks of accidental shots.

That's not the point. These are American soldiers. The men that defend our freedoms...and have saved your countries ass once or twice. These men are beyond trustworthy, and they've been treated shabbily, and inappropriately, and it's inexcusable.

This guy deserves neither freedom, nor security.
 
They don't need loaded guns. I mean, they won't have to defend themselves or their families or homes from crimes.
So why would their guns be loaded ?
Removing the bolts reduces the risks of accidental shots.

Maybe that's why the one on the left looks like he's about to release steam from his ears.



That's not the point. These are American soldiers. The men that defend our freedoms...and have saved your countries ass once or twice. These men are beyond trustworthy, and they've been treated shabbily, and inappropriately, and it's inexcusable.

This guy deserves neither freedom, nor security.

...
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
They don't need loaded guns. I mean, they won't have to defend themselves or their families or homes from crimes.
So why would their guns be loaded ?
Removing the bolts reduces the risks of accidental shots.

Johan you ignorant slut,
if you think that all of a sudden they decided to do this was because of safety rather than fear that one of the marines would shoot him in his ugly monkey face because he is so hated by so many who see what he's doing than you need to go get some hot coffee and give yourself an enema with it.

no offense.
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
Obama doesn't trust the military. Not a shocker.

The problem is people not seeing the massive vote fraud that went on for him to be reelected.


:facepalm:
 
Obama will certainly get offed, it is a possibility that should not be neglected. Johan is typical of the french socialist populace who voted for Hollande and who by the same way kisses Obama's ass. Johan has no relatives that have served in the USMC or in US Army, so he will never really understand what you are trying to say to him.
 
They don't need loaded guns. I mean, they won't have to defend themselves or their families or homes from crimes.
So why would their guns be loaded ?
Removing the bolts reduces the risks of accidental shots.

Hitler didn't allow civilians to own firearms. Here he is in Paris, 1940. Perhaps your grand parents could tell you stories about how un-cool he was.

hitlerparis_zps4fa413fe.jpg
 

JaanaRuutu

Official Checked Star Member
Can we talk for a momnent about how asinine it is to refer to the current Administration as a regime? The fact that you can post 5 thousand threads a day with your stupid little conspiracies is proof there is no "regime".
 
Can we talk for a momnent about how asinine it is to refer to the current Administration as a regime? The fact that you can post 5 thousand threads a day with your stupid little conspiracies is proof there is no "regime".
True

644379_10151288560931275_1726437161_n.png

And you, Sam Fisher, Will e Worm, revidffum, meesterperfect, plumpRump, etc... would be working for free in a labor camp, with Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Karl Rove, Laura Ingraham, Mike Huckabee, etc...

If you had learn your history, you would know that dictators don't tolerate those who say they are wrong and that a dictator wouldn't allow the simple existence of an entire new channel dedicated to criticizing him.
So go, on, call Obama a dictator 'cause it just shows how moronic you are
 

JaanaRuutu

Official Checked Star Member
True

644379_10151288560931275_1726437161_n.png

And you, Sam Fisher, Will e Worm, revidffum, meesterperfect, plumpRump, etc... would be working for free in a labor camp, with Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Karl Rove, Laura Ingraham, Mike Huckabee, etc...

If you had learn your history, you would know that dictators don't tolerate those who say they are wrong and that a dictator wouldn't allow the simple existence of an entire new channel dedicated to criticizing him.
So go, on, call Obama a dictator 'cause it just shows how moronic you are
I can name at least 25 countries right now where you can't post stuff like this about their leadership. Current, right-now countries.
 
Can we talk for a momnent about how asinine it is to refer to the current Administration as a regime? The fact that you can post 5 thousand threads a day with your stupid little conspiracies is proof there is no "regime".

The first time I heard the word REGIME used to describe a presidency, was during the Bush administration. The Left were all over that term when describing Bush's 8 years.
 

JaanaRuutu

Official Checked Star Member
The first time I heard the word REGIME used to describe a presidency, was during the Bush administration. The Left were all over that term when describing Bush's 8 years.
Oh, look. More generalizations., So because a handful of leftists used the word under Bush, even though it was inaccurate, it's okay for you to also use it inaccurately? Logic!
 
Oh, look. More generalizations., So because a handful of leftists used the word under Bush, even though it was inaccurate, it's okay for you to also use it inaccurately? Logic!

Show me where in this thread where I called the Obama Administration a "Regime".
 
But you posted it so it means you agree with it.

You're so fucked in the head. Using your example, then whenever a reporter or ANYONE reports a story (good or bad) that automatically places them in favor or disfavor with what they are reporting?

When the Space Shuttle blew up killing all members of the crew... anyone who reported it or talked about it were in favor of it blowing up? :rolleyes:
 
Top