Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2 X 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 12:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- 2 X 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Album, notability not asserted. Great Moments in Presidential Speeches (talk) 06:42, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:N. Endofskull (talk) 14:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep They have 9 other albums with an article in WP, and this is the highest charting album they had, but this needs to be deleted, and the other 9 don't, where by definition are less notable. Where is the logic in that? Clearly notable article. Keep, and improve. scope_creep (talk) 22:00, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hoax. --Juno the pregnant little girl (talk) 08:10, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This clearly is not a hoax though. Fixer23 (talk) 03:34, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep An album made by a very well known artist. I don't care if they lip synched, they still hit #1 on the charts, making them notable. Would anyone delete a not very notable LP made by Pink Floyd? RomeEonBmbo (talk) 02:56, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Album by a household name.--Johnsemlak (talk) 05:41, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable artist, even if it wasn't who we thought it was. Reached #6 in the UK.[1]--Michig (talk) 11:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Article meets WP:NALBUM, as it's "by" a notable artist and has charted. Admittedly lip-synched, but that has no reflection on notability. --res Laozi speak 14:55, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.